🔍 The NYT Thinks It Found Satoshi. Bitcoin Didn’t Flinch.

The New York Times believes it has discovered who Satoshi is. Bitcoin does not care.

On Wednesday, the New York Times published an investigation by the journalist who broke the Theranos scandal, John Carreyrou: a 12,000-word piece naming British cryptographer Adam Back as the strongest candidate yet to be Satoshi Nakamoto. Back denied it. Bitcoin moved on.

But the investigation itself deserves to be understood, because it is more rigorous than anything that has preceded it.

Carreyrou spent over a year sifting through 134,000 posts on three Cypherpunk mailing lists from 1992 to 2008. Partnering with the Times’ projects editor on AI, he conducted three different stylometric analyses of all of the active contributors to those lists. In all of them, Back returned as Satoshi’s closest match.

The specific quirks were too hard to shake off: both used two spaces between sentences, both relied on British spellings, both had the same inconsistency when it came to using hyphens, both alternated using “e-mail” and “email,” and both put the word “also” at the end of sentences in an unusual way.

In the case of Satoshi, when a filtering technique was used to screen each and every active forum user for traits displayed by Satoshi, eliminating them one by one until none were left, only one name remained across all the filters: Adam Back.

The circumstantial case goes further. Back devised Hashcash in 1997, the proof-of-work algorithm that was later adopted as the basis for Bitcoin mining. Satoshi contacted Back via email prior to the white paper release specifically to verify that he would be appropriately referenced.

And then there’s the timing: had been a prolific and constant voice on Cypherpunk forums for years, but went almost radio-silent during Satoshi’s brief time frame of activity, only becoming vocal about Bitcoin six weeks after Satoshi vanished for good in April 2011.

Carreyrou also noted that Back now serves as chief executive of a Bitcoin treasury business called BSTR, which has more than 30,000 BTC on its balance sheet, and that he spoke at a conference last year from a stage named after Satoshi Nakamoto.

Back pushed back hard.

He wrote on X: “I’m not satoshi but I was early in laser focus on the positive societal implications of cryptography, online privacy & electronic cash. He said that because he has written so much, there is more data for stylometric tools to analyze than with a person whose writing history is short or stagnant, increasing the probability of false-positives if Satoshi’s true author were compared against his work.

His explanation for the period of silence: coincidence, and similar interests. Blockstream published a formal statement in which it described the evidence as circumstantial interpretation and speculation, not definitive cryptographic proof.

The crypto community largely agreed. Bitcoin contributor Jameson Lopp described it as painting “a huge target on Adam’s back with weak evidence.” Bloomberg’s Joe Weisenthal was “not 100% convinced.” Fortune pointed out that the investigation barely considered Nick Szabo, who ticks all the same boxes and whose initials are a mirror-image palindrome of Satoshi Nakamoto.

This is what’s actually worth noting. Satoshi's wallets contain an estimated 1.1 million BTC, approximately $71 billion at current prices. That would put whoever is behind the pseudonym as the 26th richest person on earth by Forbes’ accounting. With every serious investigation by a credible journalist, the security risk to whoever is behind the name increases. Early Bitcoiner Nicholas Gregory put it plainly: identifying Satoshi could endanger that person and their family physically.

The mystery is 17 years old. Back still denies it. The coins have not moved. And Bitcoin, which was designed from day one to be leaderless, does not require an answer in order to operate.

That may be the entire point.

Two minutes. $250 in USDC. Your call.

You read this every day. You know what works and what does not.

We are rebuilding the next version of this newsletter around that knowledge. What do you want more of? What is missing? What would make this the first thing you open every morning without thinking twice?

One person who completes the survey wins $250 in USDC, chosen at random.

Take the survey here

Every response gets read. Nothing gets ignored.

Visa and Mastercard look for stablecoins from the rear. Nobody noticed.

Stablecoins transferred $33 trillion in 2025. Visa moved $17 trillion. Mastercard moved $11 trillion.

No press conference. No announcement. It was just a rail that grew larger than the rails that preceded it, back when most humans were still arguing about whether crypto existed.

This week, a new report from Chainalysis put a number on where this goes. Stablecoin volumes could rise to $719 trillion by 2035 based on conservative assumptions. Factoring in any point-of-sale saturation and the $100 trillion inter-generational wealth transfer from Boomers to Millennials + Gen Z, that figure leaps to $1.5 quadrillion. Global cross-border payments total around $1 quadrillion a year. Within the span of a decade stablecoins could potentially overtake the whole cross-border payments market.

This is no longer a crypto story. Stripe acquired Bridge. On-chain stablecoin settlement by Visa reached a $3.5 billion annualized run rate. Mastercard is integrating stablecoin infrastructure into its network. The institutions that were supposed to perish from this are unobtrusively become the ones that pipe it.

The real question, though, isn’t the growth of stablecoins. That race is over. The question is who owns the infrastructure when the next billion people begin using it without even realizing that it’s crypto to begin with.

• Trump agrees to sanctions and tariff relief for Iran after ceasefire

• Why CZ chose Amazon over NFTs for his book

• XRP becomes quantum-resistant powerhouse while whales go on a buying spree

• Securitize to tokenize Currency Group stock on Ethereum and Solana

• Crypto holders in France to report self-hosted wallets exceeding €5,000

Join the Conversation!

We'd love to hear your thoughts and comments. Join our community and stay updated with the latest trends and discussions in crypto.

Twitter | Instagram | Telegram Channel | Linkedin | Facebook