🔍 Meta is back in Crypto?

Meta attempted to create its own digital currency, and it failed terribly. It is now using somebody else's. That might actually work.

Meta has closed on Diem, the stablecoin that it spent hundreds of millions only to watch regulators kill across 3 continents four years ago. The ambition was vast: a worldwide digital currency for billions of Facebook users, a brand new monetary system constructed inside the world's largest social network. Congress held hearings. Europe threatened to block it. Meta decommissioned it in 2022 and sold off the assets as salvage.

Meta quietly returned to crypto on Tuesday. No press conference. No Zuckerberg post. Just a notice on a page which states selected creators in Colombia and the Philippines can now be paid their Facebook earnings in USDC.

Same destination. Completely different route.

What changed

Meta has learned one thing very clearly from the Diem failure Every regulatory problem in the world relates to building your own currency. Licensing mandates, reserve audits, money transmission laws in each location you operate in and a target on your back from every central bank that considers private digital currency to be a risk.

Meta has none of that with USDC. Circle is a publicly traded company on the NYSE, has received its French banking licence for MiCAR compliance and operates under US GENIUS Act legislation post-2025. The compliance infrastructure already exists. Meta did not build it. It plugged in.

Its backend is powered by Stripe, which acquired stablecoin infrastructure company Bridge and built native support for USDC across both Solana and Polygon. They were already working with Stripe to handle payments for Meta. The crypto layer was just a part of the existing infrastructure. Stripe will take care of off-ramp, tax report and settlement. The upside flows through to Meta, and they don't have to shoulder the operational burden!

Why Colombia and the Philippines

The twin difficulty faced by both markets is that being paid across borders takes time and money. Overseas income is about 9% of GDP in the Philippines. For traditional creator payouts, correspondent banking chains take 3–5 days and charges 3% to 7% in fees. Settlement for USDC on Solana in less than a second and less than one cent.

Colombia faces similar structural issues. Outside the mega cities, banking penetration is still very low Mobile-first crypto wallets provide an alternative that does not necessitate a branch or even a formal banking relationship.

That experience isn't seamless yet. Neither does Meta provide you with an off-ramp. To receive local currency, creators need to go through a 3rd party exchange to convert their USDC into fiat and withdraw it from the bank. That gap is the work still to come.

The scale question

Meta has 3.3 billion users. Expanding USDC payouts across its entire creator base turns it into one of the largest stablecoin distribution pipelines for individual earners anywhere in the world. According to Polygon Labs chief executive Marc Boiron, the program could grow to over 160 countries by the end of 2026. Catherine Gu, head of product for Solana Foundation labelled Solana as "the default place for internet-scale payments."

There are already 63 of us in this stablecoin race. May: Western Union rolls out USDPT aboard Solana. Shopify allows USDC merchant payments. PayPal has PYUSD. The unified approch to Stablecoins have been approached by Airbnb, Apple and Google as well maybe X. The difference between Meta is the distribution network. 3.3 billion active users, a monetisation stack as a creator on Facebook already built and across both Instagram and WhatsApp, Rails from Stripe at the ready.

The lesson from Diem

Meta wanted to control too much of the stack. It shows historically: a currency is a political tool. It necessitates, at a nation-state level; trust. None of the techs had been able to launch a global currency as it was and in 2019, no regulators were ready to allow Meta to break this mold.

USDC is not a Meta product. That is regulated infrastructure that Meta harnesses as a payment rail just like it would Visa or Mastercard in more familiar context. The regulatory risk is Circle's. The compliance cost is Circle's. Meta speedily receives settlement and access to the stablecoin economy without actually possessing the liability.

Meta was stopped at the door when it tried to redesign global finance four years ago. It is important to understand the last case was last time, this one walked in through the side door again using some else key.

• Microsoft and OpenAI had both a model exclusivity arrangement. The following day, AWS made OpenAI models available on Bedrock. Microsoft's exclusive access to OpenAI's models and products has been restructured after four years. OpenAI can run on any cloud for customers. Amazon was quicker, announcing new GPT models up and running on AWS Bedrock within 24 hours as well as Codex and a new Managed Agents service.

• The White House is drafting guidance to clear the way for most federal agencies to resume working with Anthropic. More than a month after the Pentagon had designated Claude as "at risk of being used to support terrorism and intellectual property, data, defense services and technology transfer," which would bar giant parts of the US government from ever using it, the White House is preparing guidance that would removes such barriers for Anthropic's access to federal contracts, including access to Mythos.

• Agentic AI platform for investment banking Rogo raised $160 million Series D led by Kleiner Perkins. Investors participating include Sequoia and Thrive, Khosla, JPMorgan Growth Equity Partners, and BoxGroup. Rogo develops AI agents capable of conducting research, financial modelling and deal analysis on behalf of banks and asset managers.

• After the Brussels talks ended in failure, the deadline of August 2 for high-risk AI tools under the EU AI Act is still on. Strasbourg saw a 12-hour trilogue on the AI Act Omnibus (a watering down of the original act), but left with no agreement on April 28. Any AI that is used in the hiring, screening, performance management or termination of EU-based employees also continues to fall into a high-risk category under Annex III.

Join the Conversation!

We'd love to hear your thoughts and comments. Join our community and stay updated with the latest trends and discussions in crypto.

Twitter | Instagram | Telegram Channel | Linkedin | Facebook