💸 In 10 days, a token no one had heard of hit $6 billion. Then ZachXBT posted a thread.

In 10 days a token none of us had ever heard of before hit a $6 billion market cap. Then ZachXBT posted a thread.

RAVE debuted quietly on Binance Alpha in December 2025. A governance token for RaveDAO, a web3 project that connected music festivals and nightlife to blockchain-based community involvement. It traded near $0.25 for weeks; largely ignored. Then April happened.

RAVE has soared to around $28 over nine days up from $0.25. A double-digit-thousand percent move that saw the token with a token cap worth hundreds of thousands of dollars, just briefly making its entrance into the top 15 higher marketcap currencies and on the way to overtaking Litecoin and Avalanche.

RAVE had a market capitalisation of more than $6 billion at its peak. Retail traders joined in on the enthusiasm, and short sellers who were betting against it got obliterated. About $44 million in RAVE positions were liquidated in a single day, the bulk of them long traders who had been right about everything except timing.

Fast forward to April 18, and on-chain investigator ZachXBT published a thread.

What ZachXBT found

Chain data to substantiate the allegations of wrongdoing was also specific. At launch, RAVE has a total supply of 1 billion tokens. ZachXBT reported that wallets attributed to the original distribution held around 90-95% of that supply in three team-linked wallets.

He recorded nearly $42 million in RAVE transferred to Bitget, with $32 million withdrawn shortly after that What he described as unnecessary forced liquidations on the short side based on stripping sell pressure from order books.

He had already warned quietly. On April 13 and April 14, ZachXBT contacted RaveDAO co-founder Yemu Xu. He received no response. He went public on April 18 asking Binance, Bitget and Gate. io: opened investigations and set personal bounty of $10,000 for whistleblowers. That number was pushed even higher to $25,000 with community contributions.

On the same day, exchanges responded. The exchange began looking into the matter, Bitget CEO Gracy Chen publicly stated. "We are also looking into it," said Binance co-CEO Richard Teng. Gate. io acknowledged the request.

The market ahead of their conclusions had already taken this into account RAVE price dropped from around $26 to $1 in just 24 hours for a drop of about 95% and the token lost ~$5.7 billion market capitalisation.

The team's response

RaveDAO also rebuffed connecting with the trading activity. While attributing the price pump to organic growth, including outreach and increased viral mindshare from influencers, the team claimed that they had no intention of intentionally causing such a rally.

It acknowledged that it might sell unlocked tokens to cover operating costs in the future but did not respond to the specific on-chain evidence presented by ZachXBT or offer any transparent safeguards.

The price was not stabilised with the denial. Unlike some other cryptos, RAVE failed to recover post the statement and continued its fall.

When the price fell below $1, ZachXBT then subsequent reported more wallet activity linking team addresses to other exchange deposits. Even as the token fell to more than 90% down, the selling of their fund and tokens continued, he said — which was consistent with insiders exiting at a value while retail holders taking on the losses.

The bigger picture

ZachXBT did not mince words about what the RAVE episode signals beyond one token. "There have been more tokens than RAVE that are in fact manipulated on big centralised exchanges," he wrote. "Seems like the most obvious, reached top 15 market cap (in terms of MAB) within a week of release, few hours later to 95% drop. He also marked similar signals for at least five other tokens including SIREN, MYX and COAI.

And his conclusion was more than just naming and shaming bad apples. He called for structural change. "Due to manipulations, exchanges require a faster intervention. There are no easy solutions to detection at scale, but day by day delay means retail traders take losses and platforms enjoy fees on the volume. The intentions may be driven by malice or mere ignorance, but the result is identical.

On the way up, $44 million in liquidations was planned for RAVE collapses, and millions more on the way down. It was not the team wallets running for $26 which showed me where the pain is on traders. Those were the retailers seeing a top 15 token and following the momentum in.

The episode comes at an inopportune time for the wider crypto market. Digital assets are becoming more widely adopted institutionally, regulatory frameworks are moving forward, and the case for crypto having matured beyond a recent history of volatility is easier to make.

That becomes an argument a lot harder to make when a token goes from zero to $6 billion market cap on the back of what looks like some sort of insider coordination, then 95% in 24 hours, and triggers $44 million in liquidations.

• OpenAI just turned Codex into a full computer-use agent. The April 16 update lets Codex operate your Mac in the background with its own cursor, clicking and typing across any app while you keep working uninterrupted. It now ships with 90+ plugins, an in-app browser, persistent memory, and a scheduling layer that lets agents resume work days or weeks later. Three million developers use Codex weekly. This update moves it from a coding tool into a general desktop automation platform, directly competing with Perplexity's Personal Computer and Claude's Cowork.

• Google launched Lyria 3 and Veo 3.1 Lite this week. Lyria 3 generates full-length songs and 30-second clips via API. Veo 3.1 Lite is its most cost-efficient video generation model, built for high-volume applications. Google also launched Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview, a real-time audio-to-audio model for voice-first AI applications. Three separate media generation launches in one week, all via the Gemini API.

• China is moving to regulate AI "digital humans" after a woman built an avatar of her dead father. Zhang Xinyu lost her father to cancer and used a company called Super Brain to create an AI avatar that looks and sounds like him. Her story went viral and exposed a fast-growing industry operating with almost no oversight.

• Northwestern researchers printed artificial neurons that communicate with living brain cells. Published this week, the flexible low-cost devices generate lifelike electrical signals and interface directly with biological neurons. Early stage research, but the first credible step toward merging AI hardware with biological tissue at the cellular level.

Join the Conversation!

We'd love to hear your thoughts and comments. Join our community and stay updated with the latest trends and discussions in crypto.

Twitter | Instagram | Telegram Channel | Linkedin | Facebook