🚀 DOGE & XRP ETFs are almost here

PLUS: Memecoin meets TradFi this week, plus tokenization wars heat up, a BTC treasury backfires, and Gemini stock keeps sliding.

Two community favorites are set to test the ETF appetite of US investors this week. 

Rex-Osprey is bringing XRP and DOGE to the American consumers – packaged in a never-before-seen way under the ticker DOJE and XRPR respectively. Eric Balchunas from Bloomberg says that we could see DOJE listing as soon as Thursday, while XRPR is aiming for Friday.

Why is this time any different?

  • This is the first time we are seeing ETFs giving direct exposure to Altcoins

  • DOJE will be the first memecoin ETF to hit the markets

  • Future based XRP ETFs and ETPs already exist and have drawn $1 Billion in inflows already but Res-Osprey aims to provide direct exposure to the underlying assets.

But wasn't the SEC delaying ETFs? Yes. While many issuer are waiting for the green signal from the SEC, Rex-Osprey sort of jumped the queue.

How did they jump the line?

Instead of filing under the Securities Act of 1933 (33 Act), which requires explicit SEC approval, similar to the long road Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs had to take, REX-Osprey used the Investment Company Act of 1940. (40 Act)

The 40 Act framework is usually reserved for mutual funds and traditional ETFs. But here’s the trick: under the 40 Act, products automatically become effective once the review clock runs out. It doesn’t need an SEC vote and hence no delays.

Fox Business’ Eleanor Terrett called it “basically a spot ETF with extras,” since 40 Act funds carry more investor protections and restrictions but sidestep the usual delays.

Quick Explainer: What are these “Acts”?

33 Act -> This Act governs the filing of new securities, and hence requires SEC vote and has a framework for postponement or delays till the vote of approval comes in. The Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs were filed under this Act and hence took so long and political back and forths.

40 Act -> This Act deals mostly with filing of investment companies like mutual funds and ETFs. Under this Act the SEC has a review period and not a formal vote, and after the review period the funds become active until the SEC explicitly intervenes. 

These products will be a good test for not the crypto market but the ETF market in general.

Why? Because retail investors in the U.S. can already buy XRP or Dogecoin directly on exchanges and self-custody them. So why opt for an ETF?

Well easier tax and portfolio management do make ETFs a more convenient option.

Factor

Buying Directly

Through ETF

Custody

Self-custody, private keys, risk of loss

Handled by fund custodian

Accessibility

Requires exchange account, wallets

TradFi brokers, retirement accounts

Fees

Exchange fees, spread

Management fee (usually 0.25%–1%)

Regulation

Limited investor protections

SEC-regulated fund structure

Perception

“Risky, degen” asset

“Legit, portfolio-friendly” product

Tax Treatment

Complex, depends on crypto rules, often treated as property with capital gains

Standard stock/ETF rules, easier for accountants and tax software


Crypto or ETF, Which one would you choose and why? 

Reply on this email, the best answer will be featured in one of our upcoming editions.

Narratives we are watching

ETH along with being the institution favourite was also the tokenisation favourite for quite some time, and with the resiliant infrastructure and consistent performance through the years, it is finally facing some heat.

Solana, Base and Arbitrum are proving that they can host serious liquidity. The tokenized assets on these chains have increased by a whopping 800%.

Solana reported a total of 81 projects, while Arbitrum expanded to 101 tokenized asset types, based on RWA XYZ data. BlackRock, Securitize, and Wormhole are the leading issuers as of September 2025. 

BNB, Aptos, TON and others are additional chains that can be used for RWA trading. These chains can provide smaller experimental mints for more varied assets and have good integration with Web3 projects.

At the moment, a lot of chains are asserting that they are the primary location for RWAs. 

Ethereum maintains its lead even though other chains provide better wallet integration and less expensive access.

According to a recent report, Ethereum is still the best option for institutional tokenisation since, unlike Solana and certain L2s, the chain has not experienced block production interruptions.

Although this could impact other chains, Ethereum's drawback is the possibility of hacker attacks and faulty smart contracts. Which, to be fair, is the drawback of every blockchain network.

The biggest tokenisation fund BUIDL by BlackRock supports this claim, It currently sits at $2.2 Billion on Ethereum. And BlackRock doesn’t take chances, especially when they put their name next to a finance product.

But the recent explosion in Base, Solana and Arbitrum is significant enough to draw the claim that tokenization is bound to have its DeFi moment and this time it’s not all retail, Institutions are in the game too.

The numbers behind the trend:

  • Total tokenized assets: $30B+

  • Breakdown: $17B private credit, $7.8B Treasuries, $2B commodities, ~$500M stocks

  • Infrastructure tokens: ONDO and LINK lead a $66B+ sector supporting this growth

This blew our mind: When a BTC treasury move leads to downfall.

When the companies thought they found the glitch in the matrix, the markets gave them a reality check.

The “Strategy” is simple: announce a BTC treasury and your stock goes to the moon.

That was the playbook when a healthcare company turned itself into a Bitcoin holdings company (to some extent).

During Monday's trading session, KindlyMD (Nasdaq: NAKA) fell 55.4%, closing at $1.24. The stock price fell 96% from its peak and is at its lowest trading level since February.

According to Yahoo Finance, trading volume jumped to over 89 million shares, the most since a late-session rally on February 12 that saw 219 million shares exchanged.

CEO David Bailey cautioned NAKA shareholders that the stock price would drop in the next few days and urged them to exit if they couldn't weather the storm in a letter to shareholders posted on X late Monday.

But what was the trigger? BTC treasury exposure? Well, not exactly.

A PIPE deal was the real culprit. Investors who got discounted shares were free to dump them on September 16. (and they dumped hard)

Here’s the irony: the very strategy that was supposed to make KindlyMD attractive has left it exposed. PIPE funding triggered a rally but the fundamentals and planning clearly lacked the grit needed for sustained momentum. Traders were quick to react. Now, instead of being valued like “the next MicroStrategy,” it risks Nasdaq compliance warnings.

Top tweets

Headline picks: By our Social Media Manager

GIF by NBC

Join the Conversation!

We'd love to hear your thoughts and comments. Join our community and stay updated with the latest trends and discussions in crypto.