- Cryptopolitan
- Posts
- š¶āš«ļø Crypto mixers arenāt just for criminals
š¶āš«ļø Crypto mixers arenāt just for criminals
PLUS: U.S. Treasury complicates the privacy debate around blockchain mixers, a Seattle CFO gets jail time after a $35M DeFi gamble, SoftBank lines up a $40B loan to double down on OpenAI, and oil surges as Middle East tensions shake energy markets.
Treasury tells Congress crypto mixers arenāt only for criminals.

For years, regulators have seen crypto mixers as methods of washing dirty cash. But the new report from the U.S. Treasury to Congress tells a more complicated story.
The agency said that mixers are not used solely for criminal activity. Other users use them for legitimate privacy reasons when making transactions on public blockchains like Bitcoin and Ethereum.
That distinction is important because all blockchain transactions are public. Anyone with knowledge of a wallet address can access its full transaction history, alongside balances.
That degree of visibility can be off-putting for average users.
A donor, supplier payment or interaccount transfer for funds decorum is likely to want that transaction history not plastered on a public ledger. In these instances, mixers increase anonymity of transaction logs and help maintain confidentiality around sensitive financial data.
Treasury officials have recognized that privacy tools can be used for legitimate purposes, like helping make users more resistant to fraud, theft or unwanted scrutiny.
Where privacy stops and crime starts
The Treasury also cautioned that mixers continue to be frequently used by criminals seeking to conceal stolen funds.
Indeed, certain decentralized or non-custodial mixers have been associated with large-scale money laundering activities. Since these systems operate without a central company governing them, they are much more difficult for regulators to monitor or shut down.
The report cited cases involving hackers linked to North Koreaās Lazarus Group, who it says have used mixers to move stolen crypto after exchange hacks.
Custodial mixers: services that take control of usersā funds during mixing and return them once itās done, could leave breadcrumbs law enforcement would be able to track. Because such platforms are owned and operated by identifiable corporations, authorities have the means to compel them into compliance with financial legislation, or disclose user information when warranted.
Decentralized mixers, though, pose a far greater challenge.
The increasing debate over privacy vs surveillance
The Treasuryās findings come amid calls from lawmakers to increase oversight of the digital asset industry.
In recent years, regulators have proposed widening identity verification requirements for crypto services, claiming stronger compliance rules are needed to tighten the taps on money laundering and sanctions evasion.
One of the more prominent proposals making the rounds is a piece of legislation known as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025, or CLARITY bill for short. Supporters say the legislation would provide long-needed regulatory clarity, while critics warn it could drive platforms to gather much more personal data from people.
Privacy advocates say robust enforcement of āknow-your-customerā rules could sabotage one of blockchainās most important selling points: the ability to do business without revealing an abundance of personally identifying details.
Other concerns include that new financial technologies could increase government surveillance. Other investors, including hedge fund boss Ray Dalio, have cautioned that because central bank digital currencies would be issued by empires, authority figures could use them to track financial behaviour more intimately than traditional banking systems allow.
That tension is at the core of the Treasuryās report.
Tools that are designed to protect financial privacy can also make it more difficult for investigators to track illegal activity, leaving regulators to balance an often-complex equation between privacy and security in the digital economy.
POLL: After the recent geopolitical tensions, which asset do you trust most in a crisis? |
š Market Watch

1ļøā£ One crypto gamble sends a CFO to prison
Ex-Seattle CFO gets 2 years for $35M theft to fund DeFi trading strategy promising returns over 20%
Initially, the plan generated roughly $133k in profit before millions were lost with the collapse of Terra. The prosecutors said the scheme almost bankrupted the company and resulted in layoffs that impacted dozens of employees.
The conviction adds to a list of high-profile crypto fraud convictions, including the 15-year sentence handed down to Do Kwon and the 25 years that Sam Bankman-Fried will spend behind bars.
2ļøā£ SoftBank prepares $40B loan to double down on OpenAI
SoftBank is in discussions to raise a bridge loan of as much as $40 billion to increase its investments in OpenAI, potentially creating the largest dollar borrowing in the companyās history.
Founder Masayoshi Son is turning OpenAI into the centerpiece of SoftBankās next major technology bet, even as rating agencies have cautioned that growing exposure could stress the companyās balance sheet.
The move comes with the global race for AI infrastructure heating up.
3ļøā£ Aramco rises as oil markets respond to war in Middle East
Shares of Saudi Aramco soared over 4%, their largest intraday gain since 2023, as oil prices rose in the second week of conflict between Israel and Iran.
Brent crude has jumped above $90 a barrel, as traders gradually incorporate into prices the potential of supply stoppages linked to tensions in and around the Strait of Hormuz, which accounts for about one-fifth of global shipments.
Energy companies have become some of the biggest winners so far from the geopolitical shock.
š„ Top tweets
Here are Cryptopolitanās top picks:
Are you watching this?
OpenAIās hardware and robotic engineering boss has resigned from the company, citing concerns about the surveillance of Americans without judicial oversight.
š By the numbers

The swap speed gap in non-custodial exchanges
Speed is becoming one of the biggest differentiators among non-custodial crypto swap services.
A new benchmark report from Swapzone analyzing 150,000 completed transactions shows how widely execution times can vary across platforms.
According to the dataset, the median time for a USDT ā ETH swap across non-custodial services sits around 45 minutes. By comparison, ChangeNOWās median swap time for the same pair comes in under 60 seconds.
That gap highlights a structural issue in this part of the market. Unlike centralized exchanges where trades execute instantly, non-custodial swaps often require several steps: deposit confirmations, liquidity routing, and final settlement on-chain.
Each of those stages can add delays. And in volatile markets, that time window matters. If a swap takes half an hour to process, the market price can move significantly before the transaction completes.
Platforms focused on optimizing routing and settlement infrastructure are trying to reduce that gap. According to ChangeNOWās Chief Strategy Officer Pauline Shangett, speed is becoming a trust factor for users.
āWe consider speed a fundamental pillar of user trust. Our goal is to eliminate latency as a barrier between traders and their funds.ā
As competition among non-custodial platforms intensifies, faster execution may increasingly become a key battleground.
Monday headline picks

Alibaba reports rogue AI agent as fears of technical malfunctions grow
Seattle CFO jailed for stealing $35M to chase 20% crypto returns
What should investors expect from the Federal Reserve after latest jobs data?
Stablecoins to stay banned despite South Korea lifting corporate digital asset embargo
China condemns US and Israelās war in Iran, but says Jinping will still meet Trump
Meme of the day
Join the Conversation!
We'd love to hear your thoughts and comments. Join our community and stay updated with the latest trends and discussions in crypto.
Twitter | Instagram | Telegram Channel | Linkedin | Facebook

