- Cryptopolitan
- Posts
- 𫨠Arthur Hayes logic: crypto markets are crashing because the community canât agree on why theyâre crashing
𫨠Arthur Hayes logic: crypto markets are crashing because the community canât agree on why theyâre crashing
PLUS: Bloomberg published the inside story of how Anthropic discovered Mythos was too dangerous to release.
No one seems to have a consensus on why crypto is crashing. Thatâs the crash in Arthur Hayesâ book.

When a market drops, and no one agrees on why, the confusion itself becomes the risk. Thatâs where crypto is at this moment. The war goes on, the ceasefire fell apart, Bitcoin is down from its highs and the community is still debating which macro force is causing the price drop.
Arthur Hayes has another framing. In his newest essay, he claims to know nothing about war fighting and doesnât have any inside track on what the worldâs leaders will do next. What he has are publicly accessible data, elementary arithmetic and a portfolio to defend. And from that perspective he perceives three scenarios each worth trading around, with a distinct implications for Bitcoin, the dollar and the international monetary order.
Scenario one: The war ends. The problem does not.
If US gets a deal with Iran and things go back to where they were Feb 27, Hayes says donât celebrate so soon. The deeper danger was already underway before the first bomb fell. AI is supplanting white-collar workers throughout the American economy at a speed thatâs only for now beginning to appear in the data.
Hayes is frank about what this imagines. Consumer spending accounts for approximately 70% of the US economy. Bank credit funds that spending from consumers. Those loans show on bank balance sheets as assets. Under this scenario, if the jobs go, then the credit goes out with them and banks begin to resemble 2008.
He is not speaking abstractly. He mentions a crypto gaming founder who ran Claude over Christmas 2025, created usable code in days, convened senior engineers to reimagine the entire structure of the company and then planned on laying off 50% of staff. The workflow that took their place codes 24 hours a day. The best engineers become 10x to 100x productive.
The average workers are left behind. The average unemployment payout in the US is roughly $28k per year. The median knowledge worker salary it displaces is $85,000 to $90,000. And that gap translates directly into missed debt payments.
Even with the war ending, Hayes says Bitcoin gets only a limited bounce, perhaps $80,000â$90,000. Only when the Fed comes in with real liquidity does Bitcoin take off again, he argues. But without that, the ceiling is low.'
Scenario two: Iran retains the strait. The petrodollar cracks.
If Iran keeps the Strait of Hormuz and continues operating its tollbooth, allowing friendly vessels to pass for $2 million each payable in yuan, crypto or sanctioned dollars, then the ramifications for the dollar are worse than most everyone is pricing in.
Hayes walks through the math. Most large economies have trade deficits with China, which requires them to pay for Chinese goods with yuan. If dollar-denominated trade routes become unavailable to them, they sell off US Treasuries and tech stocks, purchase real gold and then exchange that gold for yuan in either Shanghai or Hong Kong. Fed foreign securities holdings have already fallen $63 billion since the war began.
Non monetary gold has cemented its position as Americaâs largest export in four of the last five months, increasing by 342 per cent compared with a year earlier. Swiss refineries are remelting US gold bars to make gold in the smaller formats favored by China.
As Hayes writes: "The yuan and gold will likely become the only two transactional currencies of sovereign trade. If dollars cannot ensure that pirates donât ruin your stuff, why even hold it?â
In fact, this is the most constructive scenario for Bitcoin. The structurally declining petrodollar compels central banks to print. Printing lifts hard assets.
Scenario three: The US seizes the strait by military force. Everything gets worse.
If the US military does so via a bombing campaign that obliterates Iranian energy infrastructure and provokes an Iranian response against Gulf producers, the global commodity shock would be of such magnitude as to compel central banks to engage in emergency money printing even as supply disappears, says Hayes.
He is equally dry here in the Bitcoin implication as well. A money printing-fueled rally, in this scenario, at least, could prove short-lived because the elimination of the Iranian state significantly increases the odds of an escalation into a broader conflict. He writes, âThe spice certainly isnât going to flow.â
What Hayes is does with his portfolio
He is not trying to predict which scenario unfolds. One is to secure a performance that beats hydrocarbons, food and gasoline prices, at best, and in the worst case still comes out ahead of almost all other major assets. That points to Bitcoin along with gold and energy as the three legs of a portfolio destined for life in a world where dollar hegemony in global trade is structurally challenged.
Those disagreements in the crypto community about why prices are dropping arenât background noise. It is signal. When the smart money cannot agree on a causality, it cannot size positions with either conviction or confidence. It is this hesitation that keeps the ceiling low until the Fed blinks.
Hayes thinks it will blink. He just does not know when.
POLL: Arthur Hayes mapped three scenarios for Bitcoin. Which one are you positioned for? |
đ Market Watch

1ď¸âŁ The day Trump declared the ceasefire, someone bet $950 million on oil prices dropping. The CFTC wants to know who.
The pattern has happened twice. Oil futures swung dramatically in the minutes leading up to Trumpâs post on Truth Social indicating talks with Iran. Then on April 7, just hours before the ceasefire announcement sent oil tumbling down 15%, traders tailored a $950 million short on crude.
Accounts that were recently created allegedly used it to score hundreds of thousands in profits. The CFTC is investigating both transactions now. Senators Warren and Whitehouse sent a formal request which described it as a potential ongoing misappropriation of government information.
Rep. Torres called it possibly the biggest insider trading case ever. The White House had previously advised staff not to bet on war-related market moves. Someone missed the memo.
2ď¸âŁ A Google bet on SpaceX in 2015 is worth $122 billion today.
Google LLC owned a 6.11% stake in SpaceX as of the end of 2025, according to a regulatory filing in Alaska that was revealed this week. At the $2 trillion valuation SpaceX is aiming for its June IPO, that stake is valued at $122 billion.
The xAI merger likely diluted it to about 5%, still a $100 billion valuation. When SpaceX was valued at $10 billion, Google initially invested $900 million in 2015. And that is a 100x return on paper, rated at much less than its actual worth still on Alphabetâs balance sheet. Alphabet will report Q1 earnings on April 29. The SpaceX line item is perhaps the most interesting number of all in that call.
3ď¸âŁ WLFI just recommended to burn 4.5 billion of its own tokens. The timing is not coincidental.
World Liberty Financial submitted governance proposal regarding 62.3 billion locked tokens a week after collateratizing, 5 billion WLFI tokens to lend $75 million in stablecoins and lock out ordinary depositors. Founders and team members would have 10% of their allocation, or about 4.5 billion tokens burned immediately upon passage.
The rest would vest over five years, with a two-year cliff. E early supporters hold 100% of their tokens, but they are subject to a four-year vesting schedule. WLFI is currently changing hands for about $0.08 after a 76% drop from the peak price ever reached.
The token burn is positioned as something that will align in the long-term. Whether the market interprets it that way, after the week leading up to this one, is another matter entirely.
đĽ Tweet of the day
AI highlights by our cat

Bloomberg published the inside story of how Anthropic discovered Mythos was too dangerous to release. An Anthropic researcher tested it at a wedding in Bali. By morning he had working exploits. The model found a 16-year-old flaw in FFmpeg that had survived five million automated security tests. Mythos is now the centre of an escalating standoff between Anthropic, the Pentagon, and the Treasury. Bessent and Powell called an emergency meeting with Wall Street CEOs. The UK's AI Security Institute confirmed it is a "step up" in offensive capability over anything previously evaluated.
The real headline from Mythos is not what it found. It is the speed. Anthropic has already identified thousands of high-severity zero-days across every major OS and browser. "Vulnerability discovery is outpacing patching," the CTO of RunSafe Security told Fortune. That gap is the problem. The defensive race has started. The offensive capability is already here.
Anthropic hired Trump-linked lobbying firm Ballard Partners after the Pentagon designated it a supply chain risk, a label normally reserved for foreign adversaries. The dispute centres on Anthropic's refusal to allow Mythos to be used for autonomous weapons or mass surveillance. The company is also mounting a legal challenge. The AI safety company and the US defence establishment are now formally at odds.
NVIDIA launched Ising, the world's first open-source AI models for quantum computing, on April 14. The models handle quantum error correction 2.5x faster and 3x more accurately than traditional methods. Partners include Harvard, Fermilab, and Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. Mostly overshadowed by the Mythos news cycle, but worth watching.
The number this week: Mythos found a 27-year-old bug in OpenBSD at a compute cost of less than $50. A human security researcher would take months. That cost curve is the story.
Meme of the day
Join the Conversation!
We'd love to hear your thoughts and comments. Join our community and stay updated with the latest trends and discussions in crypto.
Twitter | Instagram | Telegram Channel | Linkedin | Facebook
